The Coalition of The Devil — God Help Us

I just this moment heard an ad (from a coalition support group/union) supporting the coalition. The thing I find astounding is these groups ranting that the government has not got the job done. This government was just elected in October. Additionally they've not yet announced their 2009 budget (plan) and they are being labeled as "not getting the job done".

This ad in particular suggested the government has done nothing to protect jobs. Short of throwing tens of billions of dollars at "some industries" and "infrastructure" (which was done I understand) what more can be done?

• The Bank of Canada is independent no?
• The price of oil is beyond his circle of influence no?
• The housing market has been super-heated for so long now is there really any hope of extending that?
• Is there any guarantee that the Big Three will be any more solvent were Canada to throw billions there?
• Do Canadian banks need rescuing?

So what can be done? I say cooler and saner heads need to prevail to allow Canada to ride out the storm. A coalition propped up by the Bloc simply cannot "save" Canada.

Manitoba: Land of the Entitled

I was recently involved in a discussion on the woes of Manitobans. It started with a comment I heard yesterday on the Mercer Report of all places. In one of Mercer's commentaries he discussed the current state of all provinces and territories in Canada wherein he concluded Manitoba was a "never has and never will be province". Manitoba!

It continued this morning when I read Manitoba would never eliminate business taxes because "this province could never afford the poor". The notion Manitoba must afford the poor is mind-boggling.

I believe this impression we and others have of our province is hugely counter-productive to turning it around. I believe it begins and ends in this society of the entitled we've created in Manitoba.

We do have a society of entitlement here in Manitoba. The notion Manitoba is a province of the poor is absurd. It is the province of the chronically lazy. Our unemployment rate has been amoungst the lowest in Canada for a few years now. Business is SCREAMING for tradesmen yet we have Indian Chiefs crying unemployment amoung their people is epidemic.

We have some of the lowest secondary education fees in North America. Ton's of jobs. A relatively stable economy. Why aren't people working?

People argue eliminating our business taxes can't be done because we have too many poor. Stop funding these entitled people. The lowered business taxes (plus a business friendly government) will lead to more business leading to more jobs.

Jesus H. Christ we've got 10,000 plus immigrants entering Manitoba annually and they all seem to be productive taxpaying citizens immediately.

Our own people must get off their asses and get to work. And now.

Manitoba Economy

According to the statistics, Manitoba is leading the country in the following economic performance indicators:

• Manufacturing capital investment is up 29.8 per cent, compared to 5.3 per cent nationally. In the last 12 months, the number of manufacturing jobs increased by 1.7 per cent compared to a loss of 5.4 per cent nationally.
• Construction work increased 13.7 per cent, compared to 4.7 per cent nationally.
• Total exports increased 9.9 per cent, compared to 2.5 per cent nationally.
• Capital investment is forecast to be up 11.3 per cent, compared to 4.6 per cent nationally.

Source: Province of Manitoba

Discuss this further on the Winnipeg Sandbox.

Building a Sandbox

About a year ago I discovered on line forums. More to the point I discovered on line forums about Winnipeg. I quickly became addicted. And I spent far too much time pounding the keyboards while participating in many varied discussions about the old home town.

When playing in those forums you "meet" many wildly different people that share in your passion for the topic at hand. Some will agree with you. Others not so much. Some will debate passionately but politely. Others not so much.

It is the not so much peeps that strike a raw nerve in my tolerating coping centre. It is those people that will more likely than not receive an admonition from this writer. More times than naught a polite admonition. Other times less so. Usually the point is made and I move on. Other times it requires more vigorous debate. Good times. Some time.

A couple of months ago the owner and moderators of a particular favourite forum went overboard (in my view) with their moderation of that site. I felt they were going too far and told them so. Long story short they temporarily suspended a particularly popular member of the forum over a rather innocuous comment. I thought the move to be heavy handed and "suspended" myself for the same period. As did other members. These members were the top posters on that site (by volume at least).

When everyone returned from suspension and self-exile the shite hit the fan resulting in many members being banned from the site. And other members banning themselves. I was one of the self-banned members.

That was the genesis of the sandbox. Jonsing over the absence of my most pernicious time consumer I created a new forum for the banned and self-exiled members. Not having any experience in building or running such places I started by creating a Goggle Groups forum. It served its purpose but was slow and clumsy and unattractive. Which led to discussions within the small but growing membership of finding something else.

One member found a free forums site that provided just the vehicle we were looking for. I tried to create our new site with that tool but was quickly frustrated. That led me to a search for similar sites. That is when I found Forumotion.com. And the rest is history.

In very short order "The Winnipeg Sandbox" was created. Let me remind you I had zero experience in such matters. But the tool was easy to use, somewhat intuitive and attractive. Other than the constant niggling a perfectionist brings to the table the sandbox has performed exceedingly well. Our membership after a month has reached almost 50 members, and growing. We are averaging 200 posts a day and have generally outperformed our competition.

And there is little to fear about the moderators and administraters becoming more than the members and their posts. We are mostly self-moderated. The members will tell those that choose to behave innapropriately how they feel. That alone is usually enough. Oh, only after creating the Winnipeg Sandbox was I banned from the other place. The reason? Advertising another forum.

If you are a fan of Winnipeg and wish to become involved in the many varied discussions about Winnipeg why not drop by. We'd love to have ya and you might well find it worthwhile. Tell them a grumpy old man sent ya.

The Winnipeg Sandbox. One month old. Drop by and wish us a happy birthday.

New Critter Welcomed

Since Gumby passed away last year the old homestead seemed to be missing something. This in spite of the fact there remained two cats and a dog to keep me company. Pokey, a 12 year old Calico. The Queen of the manse. Dahg, a 10 year old DSH, and Toba, a 2 year old Cockapoo. Daddy's girl.

Further, Pokey - acquired 10 years ago to keep Gumby company, has become more and more clingy. While this is both good and bad I believe Pokey increasingly misses Gumby and his company. Gumby and Pokey became fast friends upon meeting in 1999. They constantly played together and kept each other company. Then Toba was added in 2006. A dog!

Suffice to say Pokey's nose is seriously out of shape.

The new addition is an adorable 2 year old Tortoiseshell. Weighing only 6.5 pounds, she is tiny. After maybe 4 hours she has demonstrated zero concern over the dog, and slight disdain over Pokey and Dahg. Since Dahg doesn't like anybody (except Dad) I have high hopes Pokey and the young girl become friends and playmates.

That said I need a name for the newest addition. I don't like the traditional names (after all, I DO have a cat named Dahg!).

So, what shall I name her?
----------------------------------------------------------
For those following this thread I have named her Winn. Anyone care to guess what that is short for? ;>}

Building Winnipeg to meet the lowest common denominator

Winnipeg has been slow to evolve. Slow and steady is the mantra of citizens and politicians alike. It seems that should someone come up with an innovative, never before done in Winnipeg idea, many Winnipeggers nix it even before the ink is dry on the proposal.

I wonder what it is with us Winnipeggers that drives us to shun progress with such vigour rarely displayed elsewhere.

Several good examples of late include the Human Rights Museum, the South Point Douglas/Stadium proposal, the Polo Park Stadium proposal, the Canad Inns Water Park proposal, the Assiniboine Avenue condo project...

The whining about not having these things is incredible. And yet the volume against those innovative proposals is deafening. For so many reasons. Especially the use of taxpayer money. What astounds me is the number of people who nix these proposals because they are not fully accessible by everybody.

While I believe it would be wonderful for everyone to enjoy equal access to everything, that is not the way the world works. What we get when we build to accommodate the lowest possible denominator is what we have now with many public amenities. Swimming pools and community centres are a couple prime examples. Vanilla.

Many people want other flavours. The trouble is with public amenities we cannot (or will not) afford chocolate or strawberry flavours. And the vanilla flavours are often under-used.

The proposal to redevelop Winnipeg's South Point Douglas area is a prime example. This is a part of Winnipeg that has been allowed to deteriorate to the extreme. Here is a tract of land on the banks of the Red River that is almost completely undeveloped, with little more than one or two dozen ramshackle, run down houses and some modest commercial properties.

Along comes the Aspers with a pretty neat proposal to fully develop that area. Beautiful new water park, retail development on the banks of the River and a $150 million football stadium. Nope, we don't want that here. Save the houses. Some even say we need to save the unaffected neighboring houses: can't have that, the taxes will go up.

Unfriggenbelievable.

The negative-naysayers of this city better give their collective heads a shake. And soon. What these whiners seem to ignore is the fact we don't have a whole lot of people knocking down our doors with fistfuls of loot looking to develop this burgh.

And don't whine 20 years from now at the snail-like pace of development in Winnipeg. We've had a chance to get what others have and we cavalierly waved them away.

Oh, and don't bother rebutting this post here. I see too much of that elsewhere.